- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·Really? Me find no source
2021 F1 Discussions
- Posts
- 6,057
- Likes
- 7,307
imagwai
·Really? Me find no source
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·You'd think the official formula1.com site would report that kind of thing
- Posts
- 5,019
- Likes
- 22,599
YY77
·Really? Me find no source
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·Oh nooo, I was hoping he would be disqualified from the grand prix.
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·Now he still has a chance to score points on Sunday. That cheating seven time world champion cheat cheater.
- Posts
- 4,257
- Likes
- 7,184
Yago
·Oh nooo, I was hoping he would be disqualified from the grand prix.
He’s lucky this is a sprint race weekend. He’ll be able to gain places today for the race tomorrow.
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·He’s lucky this is a sprint race weekend. He’ll be able to gain places today for the race tomorrow.
- Posts
- 4,257
- Likes
- 7,184
Yago
·Now he still has a chance to score points on Sunday. That cheating seven time world champion cheat cheater.
- Posts
- 4,257
- Likes
- 7,184
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·According to the FIA document the stewarts accept that the fault was not by design.
- Posts
- 8,412
- Likes
- 16,994
- Posts
- 4,257
- Likes
- 7,184
Yago
·Please explain so I understand. The wing was not designed for cheating so it was sort of ok that they cheated but not really ok? These Mercedes cheat tacticts are so sneaky sneaky
The FIA agreed that the same design had passed previous tests and said they were satisfied that the design met the intent of the regulation, stressing there was no indication of "any intent to exceed the maximum dimension either by action or design."”
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·“Owen (Merc chief designer) said that the design was intended to meet regulations and blamed the deflection on "additional play either in the DRS actuator or the pivots at the end, or some combination or other fault with the mechanism, or incorrect assembly of the parts."
The FIA agreed that the same design had passed previous tests and said they were satisfied that the design met the intent of the regulation, stressing there was no indication of "any intent to exceed the maximum dimension either by action or design."”
- Posts
- 10,204
- Likes
- 13,207
Jim Dollares
·Now we shall pray that @Yago is right about Bottas wanting Max to win. We don't want Merc to do damage control by launching the Bottas missile bomb in the sprint start
- Posts
- 4,257
- Likes
- 7,184
- Posts
- 3,034
- Likes
- 2,969
Pitfitter446
·Incorrect assembly on an F1 car that was not checked, double checked and checked again just in case, My arse!
- Posts
- 22,184
- Likes
- 31,420
Aquagraph
·So Lewis still gets a five place drop on Sunday right?
- Posts
- 4,257
- Likes
- 7,184
- Posts
- 4,063
- Likes
- 5,936
kappa_md
·Pitlane start for Sprint Race? Then another 5-grid drop for Sunday Race?
