Aquagraph
·The cal 17's are 41mm 🙄 are you not supposed to know about such gigantic watches
Oh... sorry. That must be why I quite like those then. That's a relief, I thought I was going all Heritagey for a moment.
The cal 17's are 41mm 🙄 are you not supposed to know about such gigantic watches
But wait, if they aren't re-issues and they are the size of sometHING Dr Dre would hang around his neck, why do they have Heuer branding?
But wait, if they aren't re-issues and they are the size of sometHING Dr Dre would hang around his neck, why do they have Heuer branding?
To ensure no one would like them? I have no idea to be honest. These seem to move slowly on the secondary market, the ones I have 'watched' have been available forever
Which is why I hesitated to just automatically put them in the Heritage category. But I feel they're more Heritage than Modern.
http://tagheuerenthusiast.blogspot.com/2022/01/history-heuertag-heuer-2000-series-1982.html#more
Wow, even longer than I thought...
http://tagheuerenthusiast.blogspot.com/2022/01/history-heuertag-heuer-2000-series-1982.html#more
Wow, even longer than I thought...
Nicely done! 👍
After seeing the 83/84 catalog pictures, I'm definitely classifying my circa '89 2000 as "vintage". It looks exactly like the '83 two tone silver & gold model, even has the same 964 reference number. Only thing different is my '89 is "TAG Heuer" branded rather than "Heuer", but my store receipt says it's a "Heuer". 😉
![]()