Interesting way of looking at it. But isn't the 'challenge' of circuit driving to go as fast as possible while keeping on the circuit, otherwise you might as well just have a huge empty slab of tarmac and stick some bollards around it like fences in a show jumping arena?
I guess part of the problem is that the drivers are expected to exploit every nth degree of speed from the circuit, and here we come back to needing physical restrictions like barriers or kerbs etc. I mean it's ridiculous when you see the slow motion shots of the drivers smacking into the kerbs at circuits like Canada and launching into the air, but it's clearly the 'fastest' way to take the corners.
The stupid thing is if you make it a free for all the slower drivers won't catch up because Max will use the kerb too and go even faster..
Which is fine, except we know that if you give these guys a free pass they will take the pi55 completely...
So really physical deterrents are the only answer..
Yeah but that's a different thing isn't it.
You know what would be a lot easier without white lines ?
Tennis.
Which is fine, except we know that if you give these guys a free pass they will take the pi55 completely...
So really physical deterrents are the only answer..
Ha ha. Yep, take that pesky net out as well.
Yes, the chicane example I used is different, but I used it just to say that whatever they put in has to be a real deterrent, both visually and actually (in terms of slowing the car down in some way). In other words, don't design circuits that allow you to cut corners or run so wide without penalty.
Just lift the track by 150mm so that there is a step down to dirt (real dirt not more concrete painted green), that'll keep them on the track since going off will result in either a puncture or a crash. No need for fancy electronic systems or time penalties!