2021 F1 Discussions

Posts
22,226
Likes
31,489
Said it before penalty drop should increase as engine changes mount up, 5 for first engine 10 for second etc, make the penalty reflect the performance increase, if a five place drop has no effect on results there is no point in doing it.

I agree, and if changing your engine gives you an advantage that easily outweighs the penalty then it makes a mockery.
 
Posts
22,226
Likes
31,489
The Guardian is knowledgeable about virtually nothing, save "social justice".

Ooooh look who it is!
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,184
The Guardian is knowledgeable about virtually nothing, save "social justice".
Damn leftist papers, I’ll make sure to double reference The Sun next time around 😁
 
Posts
5,842
Likes
15,550
I think it’s better to reply in this thread 😉

That's a strong obsession with Schumacher. So Max shouldn't win because Lewis has to win his 8th so he can beat Schumacher. And somehow this is better for F1 😲
Max is not even in this equation!
Senna was also a dirty driver. He took out two opponents in two consecutive WC final races
😵‍💫 Please don’t compare Senna with Schumacher saying that Senna was “also a dirty driver”. Schumacher was in another league, the dirtiest driver ever… FIA even changed the regulations because of him (adding the option to remove points from previous races), to avoid another fraud like the Schumacher-Hill in Australia 1994, and FIA even had to apply that new rule to Schumacher when he tried to do the same with Villeneuve in Jerez 1997 and all his points were removed from the 1997 season.

Senna was hard but not dirty, and he didn’t take out two oponents in two consecutive WC final races: in 1989 was Prost who took out Senna, and in 1990 Senna gave it back (to Prost and to Balestre). It was a 1-1 not a 2-0 😉, and Prost was who started the game, helped by Jean-Marie Balestre (FISA/FIA) 😒

Lewis has had the easiest streak in history with utterly boring seasons.
I don’t agree at all: even when Mercedes was the clearly dominant car, at least Lewis had to fight with his teammate, and he had nice battles with Nico Rosberg (losing the Title with him in 2016), and also Valtteri was able to fight for Poles and for victories with no team orders unless the competition with another team (Ferrari during two different seasons, and now Red Bull) eventually made it necessary… but where was the battle during the Schumacher/Ferrari dominance years from 2000 to 2004? Excepting 2003 (fighting with Kimi on the McLaren-Mercedes), Schumacher was racing and winning alone during those years, easy Titles having his teammate Barrichello tied by contract and prohibited from being ahead of Schumacher since the first race of the season, even when there was no threat from any other team :whipped:



IMO those were by far the most boring years in F1, and the easiest streak for a driver with a dominant car who didn't have to fight even with his teammate
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,184
You’re right about Suzuka. Senna pushed the game and was often punished for it. Agreed about the 1-1 but he was a hard and aggressive driver, pushing drivers off when he saw fit. Lewis would be whining constantly if he had to race him. Max is a lamb compared to Senna.
You are right that Lewis had to fight his teammate, but it was only his teammate. He is a fantastic driver and better than all his teammates were. He only lost to Rosberg because he lost his mojo for a large chunk of the season.
Saying you don’t agree at all simply because Schumacher’s years were even easier is a stretch.
Schumacher’s contracts were outrageous and many of the seasons boring but he was also better than any of his teammates. He really didn’t need those contracts. He was an unbelievable talent. His legendary races in the rain are testament to that. Doesn’t matter which car you drive in those circumstances. He proved himself at two teams.
Merc’s dominance over the rest of the field has been greater and has lasted longer than during any other period in F1 history. Schumacher’s contract, arrogance and aggressive driving don’t change that.
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,184
As Brundle said Senna was always ready to risk an accident. He would put you in a position that you were going to have an accident. He only let it upto you if you were going to have it. Sounds familiar.
Driving others off track or even in the wall. In an age when racing was a lot more dangerous than today. Even Schumacher would complain about Senna’s aggressive style early on in his carreer.
 
Posts
8,430
Likes
17,021
Regarding Senna, I think James Hunt said it best: "He's a genius, but a flawed genius".

This was said during live commentary when Hunt was calling the races with Murray Walker. I don't recall the race, but the line always stuck with me.
 
Posts
177
Likes
311
I also remember Schumacher qualifying in Monaco. He was pole, and spun the car in the last corner, so Alonso had to abort his qualifying lap.
 
Posts
5,842
Likes
15,550
Merc’s dominance over the rest of the field has been greater and has lasted longer than during any other period in F1 history.
I agree, and I’m very happy and very proud of my favourite car brand for that 😀
Winning 8 constructors' Titles in a row would be another historic achievement 🙄

I also agree about Senna being a hard and aggressive driver (besides being a genius), but it doesn’t mean he was a dirty driver. Schumacher was a dirty driver, the dirtiest ever. No other driver has received such a penalty in F1 history as Schumacher for what he did in Jerez 1997 with Villeneuve, which was in fact a repetition of what he did in Australia 1994 with Hill to get his first Title (it was even a worse action than in Jerez). I don’t like Schumacher at all because of his dirty tactics to win a championship, or a Pole Position in Monaco. F1 is of course very professional but if we still want to call it a 'sport', not everything should be allowed in order to win.

For this reason I don’t like that a dirty driver like Schumacher is known as the driver with more F1 Titles (we are not talking about the GOAT thing here. Drivers with less Titles like Senna, Fangio, Clark… are always ahead of Schumacher and Hamilton in those GOAT standings), and for this reason I would like Hamilton to win his 8th Title and surpass Schumacher on that as well… for the sake of sport 👍
Edited:
 
Posts
3,035
Likes
2,969
I also remember Schumacher qualifying in Monaco. He was pole, and spun the car in the last corner, so Alonso had to abort his qualifying lap.
That’s not dirty driving that’s simply unsporting behaviour, some would say clever.
 
Posts
3,035
Likes
2,969
My hope for the race is for MV and LH to go out in separate incidents and Kimi to win his last GP, I’m not a fan of either of the two title chasers. Not much chance of that happening so I will probably not be watching the race.
 
Posts
10,208
Likes
13,216
My hope for the race is for MV and LH to go out in separate incidents and Kimi to win his last GP, I’m not a fan of either of the two title chasers. Not much chance of that happening so I will probably not be watching the race.
I would enjoy this!!
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,184
Interesting but ballsy strategy by RB. Max needed to make it happen in Q3 or he would have been toast in the race with his softs behind Lewis. Don’t crack under pressure alright. If Lewis jumps him in t1 this will still happen.
A onestopper will be necessary I think and I don’t know how RB will pull that off. Lewis will be much quicker if Max needs to switch to hards.
Possible strategy: sprint away on softs and keep Lewis behind, hope for a SC from round 10-15 so Max can pit for fresh tyres. He should be homefree then. If no SC Checo should have some sort of trouble and park his car strategically on track 😁
 
Posts
5,842
Likes
15,550
Great lap by Max and great team (tow) work with Checo 👍

Anyway the different tyre strategy could be the key tomorrow… with Max (and Checo) starting on Softs and Lewis (and Valtteri) on Mediums, Max was going to lead the race after the first lap even starting 2nd, so it’s not a big difference if it were Lewis or Max on Pole. We will see who made the right tyre choice tomorrow… the different strategy makes the race even more interesting 🍿
 
Posts
8,430
Likes
17,021
My hope for the race is for MV and LH to go out in separate incidents and Kimi to win his last GP, I’m not a fan of either of the two title chasers. Not much chance of that happening so I will probably not be watching the race.
I'm not a huge fan of either driver as well. Would love to see Kimi on the podium one last time, but highly doubt this scenario will happen.

Most likely the two title chasers will come together at some point, taking one or both of them out, ending the season with both sides bickering about who was at fault. ::stirthepot::