Is my Vintage Heuer Authentic? All questions here please

Posts
830
Likes
1,557
I think it had it's place-the case is very 'of it's time' to today's eyes, but if you look at the Heuer siblings/other Economy models of the period it all starts to make sense....
1960s | OnTheDash
 
Posts
1,420
Likes
3,116
Gotcha - now it DOES make sense within the “1960s Miscellaneous” section of OTD. Actually, I had been incapable of understanding where your direct link posted above had come from since (intuitively, I guess…) I had first searched within the Carrera sections 😗

BTW: By “economy” I meant (assuming it was from the early 70s with automatic chrono calibers being all the craze back then) that in addition to the “movement downgrade” other characteristics seemed to have been “downgraded”, too.

I have to admit that I’m quite amazed that even OTD / JS wouldn’t have a live picture of this 73373 S. Is that something worth pointing out there? Or isn’t there any collectors' interest for these models?
Edited:
 
Posts
1,420
Likes
3,116
It just looked intriguing to me and I wondered why I have not seen another like it. Interesting that it actually has a known history, however sketchy that might be. And yes, it's the same one listed on C24 for probably the last year at least. Thanks to you for that history lesson👍
That Jenny, such a slut!
Funny that this one just came up…
- Being sold by a merchant in my home town,
- Over whose C24 listings I stumbled today instructing myself re. NSA bracelets (—> more in the Vintage Photo thread).
 
Posts
1,323
Likes
3,794
I actually don't think this is completely fake. Aside from the case which is questionable, it appears to be good parts for a ref. 1614 of which other examples for Champion are known. This is probably just a put-together. Wouldn't spend tons of money on it, but could be a good donor for someone who's got a case in need of internals.
It was the bright orange hands on it that had me concerned initially. What a beautiful sight! I never thought to question the case. Thanks for the input, much appreciated. And I'm still considering this one
 
Posts
830
Likes
1,557
It was the bright orange hands on it that had me concerned initially. What a beautiful sight! I never thought to question the case. Thanks for the input, much appreciated. And I'm still considering this one
Have a look at this thread. Heuer 1614 | Calibre 11 TAG Heuer Forums

I don't see anything wrong with this 1614 on the surface, (perhaps a case swap, but perhaps not.) I don't think anyone has scrutinised these in the past though as they aren't as popular as a lot of other models.
 
Posts
830
Likes
1,557
Gotcha - now it DOES make sense within the “1960s Miscellaneous” section of OTD. Actually, I had been incapable of understanding where your direct link posted above had come from since (intuitively, I guess…) I had first searched within the Carrera sections 😗

BTW: By “economy” I meant (assuming it was from the early 70s with automatic chrono calibers being all the craze back then) that in addition to the “movement downgrade” other characteristics seemed to have been “downgraded”, too.

I have to admit that I’m quite amazed that even OTD / JS wouldn’t have a live picture of this 73373 S. Is that something worth pointing out there? Or isn’t there any collectors' interest for these models?
I get you on the economy point, however Heuer were still very much making those 'inferior manual -wind' watches in the early '70s! 😉 (even the named models.)

I'm sure Jeff is aware of the omission-there are a number of gaps still to be filled on OTD. I guess a good photo (with permission) wasn't available at the time.....
 
Posts
11,820
Likes
38,335
I don't see anything wrong with this 1614 on the surface, (perhaps a case swap, but perhaps not.)

Yeah, I'm not even 100% sure either, though it seems like this case was for a different Heuer chrono of the period (see the catalog images in the thread - great find BTW!) and these have a notorious reputation for being put-togethers as all of the parts were plentiful over the past couple decades.
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,184
The 79 catalogue is a treat. Highs and lows of a company at a crossroads. Monnins together with CdG Carreras, bulky Autavias, Daytona, Verona, Kentucky 😒, Cortina, Calculator, Senator, Manhattan, LCD, quartz,… Blimey
 
Posts
2
Likes
1
Hallo, prior to my question I would like to introduce myself. I am an absolut beginner but passionate in the art of watchmaking.
From my grandfather I was gifted some mechanical vintage watches. The most interesting one is small watch labeled with „Heuer“ on the dial. It has a diameter of approx. 32mm.
Can anybody help to specify this watch? Is it even an original Heuer?
Thanks for your support!
Casdn
 
Posts
11,820
Likes
38,335
C casdn
Can anybody help to specify this watch? Is it even an original Heuer?

This does appear to pretty closely match the 1936 catalog description for the reference 2403.

31Ref2403Case5DialE.jpg

http://www.onthedash.com/chronograph/reference-2403-case-5-dial-e/

You can contact Jeff Stein, the guy behind On The Dash, to confirm.
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hello

Can you please share your thoughts on the authenticity and quality of this piece.

Many thanks
 
Posts
11,820
Likes
38,335
Hello

Can you please share your thoughts on the authenticity and quality of this piece.

Hi, could you let us know your assessment first so we might know which areas of detail you have questions about? Based on the research you've already done, what would you like us to help you with?
 
Posts
6,063
Likes
7,325
At least one of the chrono pushers is incorrect. I'd guess the crown is also a replacement. Otherwise looks OK to me?
 
Posts
3
Likes
0
Hi, could you let us know your assessment first so we might know which areas of detail you have questions about? Based on the research you've already done, what would you like us to help you with?

This is piece is 3647S. I have tried to compare with images on the dash and hands and dial look like they are genuine and not from another watch etc. I wanted to know if others would agree.

Interesting that @imagwai said one of the pushers is incorrect and that the crown is also a replacement.
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,184
Pushers indeed look different size, might be lighting.
Crown appears too thick.
 
Posts
1,420
Likes
3,116
I stumbled across the following Camaro 73345 NT on C24 and thought I’d post it „just for the fun of it” (no real authenticity interrogation here, I guess…):

Bit of a shame about the hands, really, as otherwise the watch looks nice (?) - or maybe @SteveP will enlighten us that this is actually an ultra-rare variant and authentic 😉
https://www.heuercamaro.com/models/73345-gold-plated

For what it’s worth: The seller claims the piece to be “mint/unworn” (but without B&P)…
 
Posts
1,323
Likes
3,794
I stumbled across the following Camaro 73345 NT on C24 and thought I’d post it „just for the fun of it” (no real authenticity interrogation here, I guess…):

Bit of a shame about the hands, really, as otherwise the watch looks nice (?) - or maybe @SteveP will enlighten us that this is actually an ultra-rare variant and authentic 😉
https://www.heuercamaro.com/models/73345-gold-plated

For what it’s worth: The seller claims the piece to be “mint/unworn” (but without B&P)…
For what it’s worth, I’ve had this one saved for quite a few months now. That and it’s low price has given me pause on taking a chance on it. Hope you find answers and best of luck
 
Posts
7
Likes
0
Hello everyone,

I am considering purchasing this Tag Heuer, but unfortunately, as I am not a connoisseur of the brand, I have some doubts regarding its authenticity.
I immediately became suspicious when I didn't find a reference on the back cover, but I also found it strange that the dial had written "17 Jewels".
I would like to know your opinion about this model and if it is original, what is the reference?

Thank you all!