So is this Tide complication just a Moonphase complication but with a button with Tide written on it?
Apparently, from what I've read.
I have no yacht, not even a dinghy, so have no use for a Tide complication or a Regatta timer. However, if they came out with an actual Moonphase display, I would be interested in that, especially if they could do it without the giant button on the side.
What happens when you accidentally press it in daily life, or with idle hands?
Not sure if a moon phase would be any use/interest to me, my diary tells me that and I don’t go poaching any more.😗
you probably should get a yacht to go with your watches.
Do you know the two best days in a boat-owner's life? The day he buys the boat and the day he sells it. 😁
Here's my posting on the new Seafarer -- http://www.onthedash.com/hodinkee-seafarer-introduction/
Looking forward to seeing how others here react to the watch.
Jeff
I've been looking forward to this one for a while. I placed my deposit on the boutique as soon as it opened. I wish the subdial edges were not metallic, but I'm sure it will be fine. I applaud the efforts of building the new movements and for making this in the larger case.
To me, using the 42 mm Glassbox case was such an easy decision. They were doing a re-issue of the Reference 2446C version of the Seafarer. That vintage model measures 40 mm across the dial, and 48.2 lug-to-lug, with a thickness of 14.4 mm. So the new Hodinkee Seafarer measures 42 mm across the dial, and 48.4 lug-to-lug (or 48.6 in the TAG Heuer specs), with a thickness of 14.7 mm. All this seems reasonable to me.
It's difficult to imagining shrinking the Ref 2446C to fit into the 39 mm Glassbox case. This case measures 46 mm lug-to-lug, with a thickness of 13.9 mm, so it would be smaller than the original Ref 2446C in every dimension. We just don't see many of the watch brands re-issuing their classics in a smaller format.
Jeff