- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 0
I have seen older ones on the TAG website that didnt have blue dials, I believe they were just different versions?? Are there other concerns that jump out to you immediately??
Yes. Date window not centered. Very poor/scratchy caseback engravings. Unrecognised colour scheme. Poor quality of subdial hands. Incorrect subdial markings. Wrong model number. Tag Heuer on dial/Heuer crown. Poor quality strap. Apparent corrosion on a supposedly stainless steel case. It just doesn't look right.
E edaltonHi, new to this forum and hoping you can help. This watch was sold to me as a ladies vintage 200m. I noticed two things immediately upo receiving it- 1. "Officially" has a space between it on the dial, and 2. The Heuer stamp on the clasp isn't centered. My scale needs calibration it should be pretty close to accurate- the watch registers as .05kg.
And to my next question. This 4000 series is on eBay at the moment. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/USED-VINTAGE-TAG-HEUER-200-M-SILVER-DIAL-AUTOMATIC-MANS-WATCH/152429314892
There are a couple of doubts in my mind - firstly it's marked as 695.706 but doesn't the 7 indicate a white dial, whereas this is grey? Then the movement. It seems to be an ETA 2824.2 and match the photos I've seen on line with one exception - that top plate. (1) The TAG Heuer mark looks wrong, and in any case should it be there at all? (2) what's that 1.93 in the middle, and (3) should it say "Swiss Made" not "Swiss"?
Thanks again. This is becoming an obsession!
Stuart