Having just watched more of the video I posted they ironically say don’t increase prices just sell the cheaper watches that everyone wants and then make it up on volume.
That’s pretty much the opposite of the TAG Heuer video. This does make me wonder whether the paid promotional content that the opening warning gives is the blatant plug or whether LVMH have paid them too, with the blatant plug masking said payment from LVMH…
The point I am trying to make isn’t aimed at bashing @Mspeedster for posting but that nobody can be trusted on YouTube, which is why TAG Heuer specifically get bashed often, as it’s clearly easy clickbait rather than honest opinion on design and quality of the pieces concerned.
At the end of the video, they say the sponsorship is by Brilliant and give it a little plug. Unless I'm mistaken, Brilliant has no relationship to LVMH.
Does stating that preclude them from having to mention any other sponsorship? I have no idea what the rules are in that respect.
If they are bound to state all parties who have sponsored, and we assume they are honest in that respect, then why do those two videos contradict themselves so much?
Again, this isn’t personal to you having posted the video originally btw, just my opinion on the legitimacy of YouTubers.
The Skipper & Skeleton Monaco get high praise from these two. One of them even feels the Monaco is better than a Daytona! 😲
They also talk about the challenge TAG has in going upmarket, having $25k watches sitting next to $2k watches etc. Quite relevant to this thread discussion.
That'd be some fireman! 😲
If I was mega rich, I mean like Hubert-rich, I would have them recreate a boutique in my house. That would be cool.
If I was mega rich, I mean like Hubert-rich, I would have them recreate a boutique in my house. That would be cool.
Do you have a boutique in your house Hubert? Probably got a TAG one and an Omega one... hahaha
Leaked photos of Chateu d’Hubert show the watch suite is the majority of the east wing
Is that the side with the helipad?
