Ooh bloody hell - that’s a great question, and excuse the long answer. They are 3 very different watches (and bear in mind I’ve had the p39 for only 2 days).
The pro ticks lots of boxes. It’s rugged, looks good, the dial is great and it has a complication which I really enjoy. I also love it on the nato which is something I thought I’d never say (bracelet on way). Some bemoan the thickness, but I’ve never found it an issue at all.
The ranger is an unassuming, boring, time only, printed dial watch with a great bracelet and great build quality. It’s my work daily at the moment, and is one of those that just does what it does without any hoo-hah. I love it for that, and it’s grown on me hugely.
the pelagos is a step up in materials and there’s not much not to like about it really (comparisons to 42 aside). I don’t know why they’ve called it a pelagos really, as to all intents and purposes this is as close a Tudor will go to the Sub IMO. Its the same thickness as the Ranger/ 58 and so easy to wear being titanium. I also love Adrian’s natos on it, and that will be something I’ll do too.
so which would I keep? All three have different complications/ purposes and I hope I don’t have to find out I’m tempted to say the Ranger, which costs quite a lot less than the other 2 and has squirrelled it’s way under my skin, but every time I wear the pro it puts a smile on my face. The P39 is a great watch no doubt and a step towards a more modern aesthetic I think for Tudor. I really do think they have knocked it out the park here.
Longer term, that may well be the one but right now I think the Pro is the best watch Tudor make at a price point that is pretty low for what you get (date, true GMT) so that would be it. I’ll change my mind tomorrow
😁