2023 TAG Heuer Solargraph Titanium (WBP1180.BF0000)

Posts
79
Likes
26
Not saying the Cal 5 movement doesn't have problems, but the population sample used for Jim's study is way too small to be anything close to being statistically accurate. Yet it perpetuates a constant state of FUD about the Cal 5 on the forum. I have to say it's one of the reasons I've not bought the Aquaracer Night Diver I've had my eye on, even though I realize Jim's study isn't real science.
And here you hit the nail on the head. LVMH bank on the fact that the majority of their customers (ie Joe Public who doesn't frequent watch forums) don't care, which is why the watch community pile on TAG whenever possible, because for a lot of the time they are right. Even more so for a quartz movement because most of the people who care about the details won't even consider any kind of quartz. I agree it seems there is some degree of shadiness going on (again...) albeit they claim to have made the solar panel larger, but for most people if the watch does what it says, charges in five minutes for 6 months or whatever it is, they don't particularly care if it is a lower spec than it could be or that it is also available in a much cheaper watch. Isn't the 2824 also available in £500 watches?

I agree for the part about the vast majority of Tag customers that don't even know the difference between quartz and mechanical.

Hell, that's probably why tag can ask Aquis cal. 400 money for their Calibre 5 Aquaracer 300m.

However, I disagree about the 2824 being present in 500 bucks watches. Partly.

While you can find some 2824/SW200 in 400-600 $/€/£ pieces, it's not always an apple to apple comparison.

See, most entry level brands will use standard grade movements with little to no adjustment at the factory. They just slot the thing inside the watch and call it a day.
Tag Heuer, or at least that's what I thought so far, supposedly only use élaboré or even top grade movements in their watches. They finely tune and adjust each mechanism before it ends in your timepiece.

However the recent developments in this thread suggest they just put whatever off-the-shelves stuff they have at hand, so I don't know..
 
Posts
79
Likes
26
Thanks, I thought someone told me Cal5 and Cal6 were the same. Guess I can rest easy that my Grand Carrera isn't going to suffer the same fate.

2895 is considered higher end than the 2824 and 2836 series. Refined and better thought. Love the small second.
 
Posts
79
Likes
26
Not that I am not glad that you join us as the new movement expert in the forum, questioning if our long time members who spend hours every day here "even know what a calibre 5 is", but no you are not correct in saying it should look like that. In some watches you get a higher version of the movement with some automated robot finishing yes, but reality is that many of the calibre 5's are base level movements and the tendency seems to be that TAG Heuer put whatever movement batch they can get hold off (ETA and Sellita).

I am still curious to know why you think 3k price tag is better value when TAG puts the SW200-1 inside a watch compared to the solar powered quartz? I would not be surprised if TAG Heuer pays more per unit for the solar quartz, since they are a huge company and can buy Sellitas in huge batches and get very good bulk prices.

Well I've been questioning if they did know what a Calibre 5 is because they apparently have terrible fears of reliability regarding the movement, to the point and I quote they are "afraid to pull the crown" or that "solar quartz more likely to still be working 6 months from now than Calibre 5"

I'm sorry but that's nonsense to me

From my experience with the movement that I know experienced through various brands & watches, it's reliable & accurate. Basic, but easily serviceable by any competent horloger.

However I must acknowledge the study conducted on this sub, with many issues regarding calibre 5.
I'm divided between "maybe it's legit" and "when everything's fine you don't report about it on the internet".

Well, even through their contract with Sellita, I highly doubt they can have SW200 for less than 10 bucks a piece, which sounds accurate regarding how much Citizen is selling them the E168.

it's a bare bones quartz solar, while SW200 still is a swiss made mechanical automatic, doesn't matter how basic you want to put it.

But hey I never said a Calibre 5 Aquaracer was good value, just that the Solargraph, being more expensive and quartz, is de facto a worse value.
 
Posts
10,162
Likes
13,045
Tag Heuer, or at least that's what I thought so far, supposedly only use élaboré or even top grade movements in their watches. They finely tune and adjust each mechanism before it ends in your timepiece.

However the recent developments in this thread suggest they just put whatever off-the-shelves stuff they have at hand, so I don't know..
I see, yes I think reality is not as glamorous as one would hope with TAG Heuer. They spec the cal 5 precision deviation to -15 to +25 sec per day and performance seems to vary a lot.
 
Posts
10,162
Likes
13,045
Well I've been questioning if they did know what a Calibre 5 is because they apparently have terrible fears of reliability regarding the movement, to the point and I quote they are "afraid to pull the crown" or that "solar quartz more likely to still be working 6 months from now than Calibre 5"

I'm sorry but that's nonsense to me
Hehe yes I understand. You couldn't know that @Aquagraph is very old and therefor sometimes struggle to keep his thoughts in order. But in this forum we respect and honour the elderly 😝

Anyhow, what Rob is referring to is TAG's inability to produce a crown and threads that work. Aquaracers are notorious for having to have the crown and crown parts replaced unreasonably frequent. This in combination with the sw200-1 often is shitty to operate as a user, you often cant find the crown position you want. You try to hand wind or find the date position but end up screwing down the crown over and over. But in the end, who in their right mind would want to hand wind the sw200-1 or 2824 😁 the sound and feeling gives me nightmares. If one ever wondered what the opposite to silky smooth satisfaction is, the answer is definitely sw200-1 and 2824.
 
Posts
2,697
Likes
2,582
I think he's just annoyed cos he likes it but doesn't want to pay the asking price.... we all know that feeling

This is mainly it for me. I'm waiting for the Solargraph to turn up in the outlets.
 
Posts
79
Likes
26
I am intrigued by what you’re looking to achieve from your posts @Chrisred71? Are you just making a statement that you think TAG Heuer are overpriced or are you trying to convince us that we should no longer buy them? I am just confused as you state yourself that you really like the Solargraph compared to Citizen, but then argue how much better Citizen are for the money.

You are perfectly entitled to your opinion, no question about that, so please continue to do so. A lot of people have agreed with you on some points above too.

What amuses me is that you clearly recognise your movements, but clearly don’t recognise the zero movement in people’s opinion on TAG Heuer. 😀

Most of us pretty much recognise that this hobby is a mugs game, but we still like what we like and are mostly aware that there are cheaper ways to tell the time. The £250 Citizen is cheap in relation to the Solargraph, but then also very expensive in relation to a £25 solar powered Casio. In turn, the Casio is ultra expensive compared to a Sundial or your own body clock. All rely on the Sun to tell the time.

I'm not trying to make a statement or convincing anyone or anything. Actually, I believe that Tag Heuer has some pretty decent value for money offerings amongst their current lineup.

I really fell for the Solargraph, love at first sight, no cap.
The killer looks, mad bezel. In a way solar is the way to go. No need for battery nor maintenance, pinpoint accuracy.
Tag claimed TH-50 was a bespoke development by La Joux Perret. This would be in line with the price of the watch, pushing 3k.

LJP is owned by Citizen, and Citizen are well known for their Eco-Drive technology.Then I started wondering, could've TAG did the 1887 coup all over again, borrowing some Japanese mechanism and call it their own. I did some digging, and turns out they did.

Cal. 1887 was based on a prestigious column wheel chronograph movement (Seiko TC78), complete with vertical clutch, the full package. So while hiding its origins wasn't a clever move, it was still in line and enough sophisticated/high-end to fit in the Carrera 1887 without looking out of place or making the watch overpriced.

The Solargraph is a whole different animal. The TH-50, or should I say E168, isn't sophisticated nor high-end. It's a bare bones budget solar movement you'll find in mall watches.

The seiko-powered Carrera 1887 was still legit because Tag lied on its origins but not on its quality, but this Citizen-powered is almost an hoax.

I've seen the thread and I just thought I'll let people know : you're absolutely not getting what you paid for with that watch. That's it.
 
Posts
2,697
Likes
2,582
Well I've been questioning if they did know what a Calibre 5 is because they apparently have terrible fears of reliability regarding the movement, to the point and I quote they are "afraid to pull the crown" or that "solar quartz more likely to still be working 6 months from now than Calibre 5"

I wouldn't say it's a fear, I'm just constantly amazed when I wind my calibre 5 and discover that it's still working 😁
 
Posts
8,099
Likes
16,411
I hope everyone reading that thing has the brain cells to acknowledge and understand that the H.W.R.M.E is not real and that the usage of phrases like "mega superb scientists" clearly show that there is plenty of sarcasm in the thread. But in case anyone is an idiot, yes that "study" is not scientifically proven 🙄 just a bloody survey among forum members to see how many have had shitty calibro cincos...
Regardless of whether people get that you're joking around with your wording, the net result is that it creates FUD. Not just your study, but whenever someone brings up an issue with their Cal 5. Is it really as bad as it seems on this forum? Probably not. But it's planted a seed of doubt in me, even though I have a background in engineering, business and manufacturing.
 
Posts
79
Likes
26
Are you not arguing with yourself now 😁 the whole point is that purchasing a 100 dollar quartz watch for 3k is entirely based on feelings. You're the one who showed up arguing about value for money and specs 👎

Well, I disagree. The whole point of purchasing a 100 dollar quartz solar for 3000 is based on feeling AND ignorance. If you scratch the surface even just a little bit you'll realize Solargraph is a lot more style than substance.
 
Posts
2,697
Likes
2,582
If you scratch the surface even just a little bit you'll realize Solargraph is a lot more style than substance.

Agreed. My assertion is that this also applies to the calibre 5.


Regardless of whether people get that you're joking around with your wording, the net result is that it creates FUD. Not just your study, but whenever someone brings up an issue with their Cal 5. Is it really as bad as it seems on this forum? Probably not. But it's planted a seed of doubt in me, even though I have a background in engineering, business and manufacturing.

Maybe. Remember while the sample size is not representative, it is a sample of 'people who like TH watches and happen to own a calibre 5' not 'people who joined an Internet forum to complain their $2500 watch just broke', so you would expect it to be slanted towards 'look, calibre 5s never break'.
 
Posts
79
Likes
26
I think he's just annoyed cos he likes it but doesn't want to pay the asking price.... we all know that feeling

That isn’t the best of feelings, I have to agree there.

I'm not annoyed by the asking price, I'm annoyed by Tag lying to everyone's faces by telling us TH-50 is a bespoke calibre developed just for them. Then, to add insult to the injury, they ask 3K for the Solargraph.

Which would suggest not only TH-50 is a bespoke development but Tag just invented the very Solar quartz technology themselves. Of course they didn't.

Just thought I'll let people know 😉
 
Posts
2,635
Likes
3,402
I've seen the thread and I just thought I'll let people know : you're absolutely not getting what you paid for with that watch. That's it.

So everything you’ve said boils down to your opinion being that you don’t think it’s worth the money. Surely that’s extremely subjective in that every single person will have a different sliding scale when making that decision for themselves.

I don’t think anyone on here buys TAG Heuer for their epic horological masterpieces. Pretty certain that nobody on here will suddenly find their eyes have been opened. I am also pretty certain that it’s not ignorance, as per your later post.
 
Posts
2,635
Likes
3,402
I'm not annoyed by the asking price, I'm annoyed by Tag lying to everyone's faces by telling us TH-50 is a bespoke calibre developed just for them. Then, to add insult to the injury, they ask 3K for the Solargraph.

Which would suggest not only TH-50 is a bespoke development but Tag just invented the very Solar quartz technology themselves. Of course they didn't.

Just thought I'll let people know 😉
Do you honestly believe that all of us thought this was brand new tech invented by TAG Heuer?
 
Posts
10,162
Likes
13,045
Well, I disagree. The whole point of purchasing a 100 dollar quartz solar for 3000 is based on feeling AND ignorance. If you scratch the surface even just a little bit you'll realize Solargraph is a lot more style than substance.
What? In what way is it ignorance? I told you earlier that people buy a TAG Heuer for the brand and design. And I think made it clear I am fully aware of the product being crap, but my heart desires it and I feel I want it. My heart longs for that sweet brand and the sexy design. And how it feels in my hand. How I feel when I touch it. How I feel when I gently run my finger over the crystal. Me feeling aroused turning the bezel. All of this, but I am not ignorant to the fact that the product is dawg shit.
 
Posts
10,162
Likes
13,045
Regardless of whether people get that you're joking around with your wording, the net result is that it creates FUD. Not just your study, but whenever someone brings up an issue with their Cal 5. Is it really as bad as it seems on this forum? Probably not. But it's planted a seed of doubt in me, even though I have a background in engineering, business and manufacturing.
I had to google FUD but now I understand you feel fear, uncertainty and doubt. It was never my attention to make you feel this bad, I was just doing public service for the forum trying to bring some clarity to the cal 5 discussions. It is not as if TAG would ever admit there are issues with the movement. Neither would the watch "journalists" who only dare saying positive things about the brands. And look at me, even though I did the damn survey I just bought the Ice Diver! So feel not this strong fear and try to find love in your heart, the love that allows you to take a leap of faith and go Aquaracin'. Cause doing so, is certainly something I now wish I would have done for many years already.

Scientific regards
Dr "let me hand wind you" Jim

Disclaimer: these regards are not actual science.
 
Posts
8,099
Likes
16,411
I had to google FUD but now I understand you feel fear, uncertainty and doubt. It was never my attention to make you feel this bad, I was just doing public service for the forum trying to bring some clarity to the cal 5 discussions. It is not as if TAG would ever admit there are issues with the movement. Neither would the watch "journalists" who only dare saying positive things about the brands. And look at me, even though I did the damn survey I just bought the Ice Diver! So feel not this strong fear and try to find love in your heart, the love that allows you to take a leap of faith and go Aquaracin'. Cause doing so, is certainly something I now wish I would have done for many years already.

Scientific regards
Dr "let me hand wind you" Jim

Disclaimer: these regards are not actual science.
Yes, sorry I should've spelled it out. Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt = FUD. It's not that I feel bad or am that fearful. I'm someone who should know better, as my career has taken me into the actual statistics of reliability and quality analysis. Yet I'm only human and all this negative rhetoric does have an effect even on me. So if it affects someone with my background, it surely isn't doing TAG any favors and perpetuates FUD throughout the forum at large.

EDIT: I guess what I'm trying to say is that while your intentions may have been good and you felt like you were doing a public service, you may have in fact done the opposite. Because regardless of the lack of science, it becomes a kind of propaganda against the Cal 5. I recall that it was enough to scare Hubert into cancelling his 844 tribute order.
Edited:
 
Posts
21,657
Likes
30,437
Well I've been questioning if they did know what a Calibre 5 is because they apparently have terrible fears of reliability regarding the movement, to the point and I quote they are "afraid to pull the crown" or that "solar quartz more likely to still be working 6 months from now than Calibre 5"

I'm sorry but that's nonsense to me

From my experience with the movement that I know experienced through various brands & watches, it's reliable & accurate. Basic, but easily serviceable by any competent horloger.

However I must acknowledge the study conducted on this sub, with many issues regarding calibre 5.
I'm divided between "maybe it's legit" and "when everything's fine you don't report about it on the internet".

Well, even through their contract with Sellita, I highly doubt they can have SW200 for less than 10 bucks a piece, which sounds accurate regarding how much Citizen is selling them the E168.

it's a bare bones quartz solar, while SW200 still is a swiss made mechanical automatic, doesn't matter how basic you want to put it.

But hey I never said a Calibre 5 Aquaracer was good value, just that the Solargraph, being more expensive and quartz, is de facto a worse value.

While Jim's study was far from scientific, just under half the people who replied said they didn't have any problems - so it wasn't like only people who had problems responded.
 
Posts
79
Likes
26
Do you honestly believe that all of us thought this was brand new tech invented by TAG Heuer?

Not that it was brand new tech, but not that it was off-the-shelves Eco drive either. That what i thought you guys believed about the Solargraph.
 
Posts
21,657
Likes
30,437
dtf dtf
I wouldn't say it's a fear, I'm just constantly amazed when I wind my calibre 5 and discover that it's still working 😁

You guys know how much I love my WAY208C Aquaracer, but I live in fear of that bastard crown.