Jim Dollares
·Tried the tourbillon today. Nice but dumb.
The glassbox design works very well in the 42mm case. It even has a funky cutout for the tourbillon:
I’m hoping to see some normal 42mm glassbox models down the line.
Tried the tourbillon today. Nice but dumb.
The glassbox design works very well in the 42mm case. It even has a funky cutout for the tourbillon:
I’m hoping to see some normal 42mm glassbox models down the line.
Why dumb?
When are these out anyone know?
Did the boutique have any comments on this opinion? (Not that I disagree)
As Jim said, we've been saying forever that the tourbillon should be in a smaller case and then it was released at W&W and there wasn't exactly a clatter of excitement was there?
Nobody wants a mass-produced tourbillon from TAG Heuer. People who go into TAG boutiques want F1s and classic Carreras and Monacos up to about the $7k price point, after that they go elsewhere.
The F1 is still where the big sales are at (after the Connected) and then the Carrera... but of course every Carrera = 4 F1s. The problem seems to be even if they make models that appeal to the market in the Carrera range they are just too expensive.
Anyone who does just a slight bit of research, will see this as well. When you can go buy a Tudor Black Bay for pretty much the same price as the 300, with an in-house movement and lets face it - a better case, bracelet, clasp build, etc.
Valid point about the movement, the Chanel/Tudor/Kenissi clearly has better specs. Design wise though, the black bay and the 300 are very far apart. Black bay looks old fashioned, 300 looks very modern.
I don't agree about the case, bracelet and clasp. I find the 300 to be just as good in all three of those areas. The 300 also uses AR coating while as with my Black bay half the time I stare at my own face when I look at the watch. Black bay probably means 'super reflective' in latin.
This discussion is on repeat in the forum but about the prices I also believe that Tudor has far from the brand prestige among ordinary people compared to TAG Heuer. They might get there in the future but today, at least where I live, everyone basically knows that TAG is a maker of expensive watches. In the end, 95% of the price we pay is for brand and marketing and how people around us perceive what we wear. You are not willing to pay 4k for a TAG Heuer diver but I think a lot of people still are. Breitling seem to be doing just fine, charging 4k for their Sellita Avengers and those watches look and feel like a 500 dollar piece when you hold one.
I wasn’t really comparing them in regards to style, more at the point that you get a lot more for your money with the Black Bay (in my opinion), and that the Aquaracer 300 does not justify a £3k rrp.