The Vintage/Reissue Trend - Is Popularity Diminishing?

Posts
2,833
Likes
3,877
Was listening to the Fratello podcast and they had an interesting discussion on vintage inspired watches and whether this is about to die down. They were asking the question about whether the watch industry are doing reissues as they are afraid to do more modern designs as they feel that they cannot compete with the likes of Apple, etc. in this area.

That is an extreme comparison, I must admit, but I think it’s a fair point in the reasoning behind the high number of homage reissues over recent years.

Just interested in your thoughts on whether you think Fratello are right in their discussion point and whether you feel vintage inspired pieces will begin to slow in 2023 and beyond?
 
Posts
10,400
Likes
13,748
What up B to the en! First of all, is it possible to link to this discussion you be talking about?

Secondly, I think you've come to the wrong place asking if vintage inspired editions will die. 95% of this forum will be dead if 60's and 70's designs will no longer be priority from Switzerland. On the other hand, if Dinky dong tells everyone that modern designs are the new hot stuff I am sure many will suddenly realise they love it and claim they were always fans of modernistic designs 🙄😁
 
Posts
8,831
Likes
17,945
I don't have the patience to listen to an hour plus podcast, but it really depends on the context of the discussion and meaning of vintage inspired.

Take the Aquaracer as an example, most here would call it a modern design. Yet its roots go back to the 2000 series of the 80s, nicely evolving overtime with each generation's release. The current Orange dial, Night Diver and 844 tribute all take inspiration from certain Heuer models of the past. But clearly faithful re-editions are not core to TAG's strategy, hasn't been for quite a while.

OTOH, Tudor's success in recent years can be linked specifically to creating watches that take strong inspiration from not only their vintage past, but also Rolex's. I don't see them changing that strategy anytime soon.
 
Posts
10,400
Likes
13,748
OTOH, Tudor's success in recent years can be linked specifically to creating watches that take strong inspiration from not only their vintage past, but also Rolex's. I don't see them changing that strategy anytime soon.
Funny thing this, I wonder if it is the vintage inspired designs that are the reasons for Tudor's success or is it like Rob's ad friend said that people buy Tudor cause they perceive it as a cheap and available Rolex. For collectors surely the romantic vintage designs clearly become a success but it is easy to imagine common people being told by sales reps that "these watches are also made by Rolex but under a different name for a lower price" and buyers can show off their new watch telling people it is a Tudor, made by Roooolex 🙄
 
Posts
10,400
Likes
13,748
Going back to the original question, don't you think heritage designs must die eventually? Brands will get to a point where they have re-issued everything and buyers will get bored thinking "jesus not another chronograph that looks 60 years old". I think skin divers is a good example, the market got flooded with them and today my impression is that people aint as excited about them as they were 3-5 years ago.
 
Posts
8,831
Likes
17,945
Funny thing this, I wonder if it is the vintage inspired designs that are the reasons for Tudor's success or is it like Rob's ad friend said that people buy Tudor cause they perceive it as a cheap and available Rolex. For collectors surely the romantic vintage designs clearly become a success but it is easy to imagine common people being told by sales reps that "these watches are also made by Rolex but under a different name for a lower price" and buyers can show off their new watch telling people it is a Tudor, made by Roooolex 🙄
Probably a combination of both. But if the Tudors didn't look like vintage Rolex, they would not have the same appeal.
 
Posts
8,831
Likes
17,945
The original Tudor 42mm Pelagos is a good example. Everyone says it's a great looking & extremely capable watch. But it wasn't a sales mega hit like the BB58.
 
Posts
2,833
Likes
3,877
The original Tudor 42mm Pelagos is a good example. Everyone says it's a great looking & extremely capable watch. But it wasn't a sales mega hit like the BB58.
Until it gets reissued.

Pelagos is my favourite Tudor though tbh.
 
Posts
2,833
Likes
3,877
Take the Aquaracer as an example, most here would call it a modern design. Yet its roots go back to the 2000 series of the 80s, nicely evolving overtime with each generation's release. The current Orange dial, Night Diver and 844 tribute all take inspiration from certain Heuer models of the past. But clearly faithful re-editions are not core to TAG's strategy, hasn't been for quite a while.

OTOH, Tudor's success in recent years can be linked specifically to creating watches that take strong inspiration from not only their vintage past, but also Rolex's. I don't see them changing that strategy anytime soon.
I think it’s that continual improvement that makes it current, as they’re not the same as the original. Yes, I agree it started out as the inspiration, but they’re not vintage reissues if they have slowly evolved, surely?

At the end of the day, nearly every watch could be said to have elements of it that took inspiration from elsewhere.

Tudor will change strategy soon enough if taste changes and they don’t sell so many.
 
Posts
8,831
Likes
17,945
I think it’s that continual improvement that makes it current, as they’re not the same as the original. Yes, I agree it started out as the inspiration, but they’re not vintage reissues if they have slowly evolved, surely?

Your title and first post said "inspired" not "reissue". That's why I said it really depends on one's meaning.

I never meant to imply the Aquaracer is a "reissue" of any kind, but certain models do take inspiration from the past.
 
Posts
2,833
Likes
3,877
Your title and first post said "inspired" not "reissue". That's why I said it really depends on one's meaning.

I never meant to imply the Aquaracer is a "reissue" of any kind, but certain models do take inspiration from the past.
It does indeed. Absolutely my fault. I guess my definition is different to yours, so will amend accordingly.

The point of my post is just basically poising the question as to whether the trend will turn away from reissues becoming less popular, with more modern choices taking preference, or whether we are all predisposed to either end of the spectrum.
 
Posts
8,831
Likes
17,945
I do think the trend of doing faithful looking vintage reissues has already died down.

In TAG's case, it probably peaked around 2015-2018, with the C11 Monaco, Carrera Telemeter, and heritage Autavia all becoming a part of TAG's standard product line in that timespan. But since 2020, such reissues have been sparse; the Silver 160th, Hodinkee Dato and Panda 60th being the only faithful reissues to be released in the past 3 years. The Montreal, Green/Teal & Red Carreras are heritage inspired, not reissues, since no 60s counterpart exits for them.

I don't consider last year's Monaco Dark Lord tribute or the Aquaracer 844 tribute to be "reissues" either. They are modern designs that take "inspiration" from the past, hence they pay tribute. I see this as TAG Heuer's current strategy to honor their history. Using legacy names and taking design elements from the past, but re-imagining them with modern looking watches.

Omega has for a long time offered a mix of both worlds, but really faithful reissues haven't been released that often either. And when they have, like the Gold Apollo 11 50th Anniversary or 321 Ed White Speedmaster, they've been quite expensive and super hard to get.

I don't believe Breitling has done a faithful reissue since the Co-Pilot AVI & Top Time "Zorro" in 2020/21. Last year's Cosmonaute was more of a tribute style watch to me.
 
Posts
1,397
Likes
5,224
I also believe the vintage reissue has run its course. The brands will now move forward with updating models but still borrowing from the past to tie the two together. The watch still needs some romance of the past but have new tech and design to bring it to the present.

As for Tag Heuer, I think they will move more towards trying to put Heuer behind them. Marketing wise the Tag Heuer brand is more current in the common consumer than Heuer. Heuer rings with the vintage market but not with today’s customer. Especially if they are trying to bring new younger consumers to the brand. Mario, Solar, colourful F1’s and Connected are indicators of them trying to connect with that market.

I don’t mind Tag on my dial as long as it’s good design. Anyone that asks me about my watches doesn’t know the history of Heuer, only that it’s a Tag, the brand they’ve known from their childhood. Heuer only confuses them. They should just work towards making watches the consumer wants - everything else will fall into place.
 
Posts
1,417
Likes
4,140
Sorry, but I disagree. I mean who cares what the youngins think? Or what they are confused about. I realize they are the future collectors but there will always be the history of the brand. Much like Rolly, Omega and the like. Some adaptations of vintage style points are welcomed by me.
 
Posts
10,365
Likes
11,757
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/fashion/watches-1960s-omega-tag-heuer.html
In Watchmaking, the ’60s Are Sizzling


Stefano Macaluso, a watch designer and car expert, said the connection between watches and cars had developed over time. “And in the 1960s, so many people were involved in motorsports, and the drivers needed wristwatch chronographs,” he said. “So, this generation of classical chronographs came about because of the popularity of motorsport. It was not only marketing; it was a need.” ... Yet watchmaking’s focus on the past in the current crop of watches both pleases and frustrates Mr. Macaluso, the watch designer and car expert. “Today we are in a constant post-something; today, we are in a constant revival of what happened 30, 40, 50 years ago,” he said. “We are kind of a time capsule where creativity about new, external design is very slow in terms of innovation, apart from a few independent watch brands.
"There is this feeling that if you create a new shape, it will not sell,” he added. “Today’s watches are beautiful, they are fantastic — but we live in the past.” ... “For instance, some Girard-Perregaux watches designed by my father, alongside TAG Heuer chronographs.” He now is working on several ’60s-influenced limited edition watches, but said nondisclosure agreements prohibited him from discussing them. Stefano Macaluso said.

Since 2002, Mr. Bove, the freelance designer, has led design teams at, in sequence, IWC, Chopard, Breitling and TAG Heuer. ... Mr. Bove said the current ’60s-inspired models from various brands weren’t just copies: “We are not revisiting the ’60s. We are revisiting legends that happened to come out in the ’60s.”

Ms. Ciancetta, the Italian architect, said that designers and artists always looked back at certain decades.
“But yes, there is a concentration of the ’60s now, which is much more powerful than any decades,” she said. “The 1960s had an impact that never went away.”
 
Posts
4,257
Likes
7,186
I don’t mind Tag on my dial as long as it’s good design. Anyone that asks me about my watches doesn’t know the history of Heuer, only that it’s a Tag, the brand they’ve known from their childhood. Heuer only confuses them. They should just work towards making watches the consumer wants - everything else will fall into place.
I agree. No point having Heuer on the dial of standard releases. Only a matter of time before the Mcqueen Monaco is updated with a TAG Heuer logo. The market for new Heuer branded watches might not be large enough to warrant loads of future releases. Usually these also get plenty of press, further alienating 'new' TAG Heuer customers and invoking cries by commentators that every TAG Heuer should have Heuer on the dial.
Maybe not a bad thing to let the Heuer brand rest firmly in the past for enthusiasts and collectors to enjoy.
 
Posts
8,831
Likes
17,945
I agree. No point having Heuer on the dial of standard releases. Only a matter of time before the Mcqueen Monaco is updated with a TAG Heuer logo. The market for new Heuer branded watches might not be large enough to warrant loads of future releases. Usually these also get plenty of press, further alienating 'new' TAG Heuer customers and invoking cries by commentators that every TAG Heuer should have Heuer on the dial.
Maybe not a bad thing to let the Heuer brand rest firmly in the past for enthusiasts and collectors to enjoy.
Agreed.
However, Heuer branded watches do make sense for a select few. The C11 McQueen Monaco just wouldn't look right with the TAG Heuer logo on it (IMHO), since it's supposed to be a re-edition of the 1133B. If it's a re-edition, it really needs the Heuer logo to be faithful.

For re-imagined tributes, like the H02 Dark Lord, they could go either way. I would've preferred it with the Heuer logo, but the TAG Heuer logo certainly wouldn't stop me from getting it.

Sometimes I jokingly wonder if the brand needs two logos, like this:

Both represent TAG Heuer. But watches that are modern and/or avant garde get the TAG shield. Watches that are retro inspired get the Heuer shield.

Nah, probably would confuse people even more! 😵‍💫
 
Posts
22,729
Likes
32,407
I agree. No point having Heuer on the dial of standard releases. Only a matter of time before the Mcqueen Monaco is updated with a TAG Heuer logo. The market for new Heuer branded watches might not be large enough to warrant loads of future releases. Usually these also get plenty of press, further alienating 'new' TAG Heuer customers and invoking cries by commentators that every TAG Heuer should have Heuer on the dial.

I don't think (some watch community) people want every TAG to have Heuer on the dial, I think they want every new TAG to look like a Heuer..