Mr_Orange
路Here i thought you choose AP over Hublot ? Or do i get mixed up ?
I said I quite liked the RO but I don't like the ROO.
Here i thought you choose AP over Hublot ? Or do i get mixed up ?
They just need to put down some screws 馃榿
It isn't just that it looks like an ROO, it is just so tasteless and completely lacking a coherent design.
Welcome to the world of Zenith Royal Oak...
What is it with these Brands just ripping off other brands lately?
Is there no creativity left?
Only 42%? So what are you complaining about?
If it ain't broke, then don't fix it I guess.
I have to say the white dial (panda) is looking pretty good in this video. Back on the fence again.
The video is entirely in German, I don't speak a word, but it has nice close ups of live wrist shots.
I think the criticism doesn't apply for Rolex either way since they are doing their own designs, not copying what others do that sell well.
I think what Rolex is doing is so admirable. Creating true timeless classics that will live through many generations.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, you crack me up. Do you really think that you are going to notice a 0.35mm difference?
If it's just the 0.35 difference, no. But it's actually down almost a full mm from the 15.3mm thickness of the previous BB Chrono, which was even thicker than the standard BB. Also, the standard BB has a kind of slab like shape to the side of its case, but this new chrono's case geometry is supposedly fully reworked. So I'm hoping the overall effect will be a slimmer feeling watch.
I really like the new Tudor Chrono Panda, but still worried about its size and thickness. However, it does seem like Tudor has implemented some tricks (like seating the movement lower) to make the watch seem slimmer than its 14.4mm thickness. Compared to the 11.9mm thick BB58 in this pic, it doesn't look that bad. (Pic credit to mallen161081)
![]()
Will need to try one on the wrist before making a final judgment.