THFan346
·There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that point of view.
However, I do think Many of today’s modern watches will never really become vintage like old ones, however, purely down to the materials they use.
a ceramic bezel as an example is highly unlikely ever to show the patina that an aluminium would. Neither modern luninova.
Michael’s example of the Ed White is a good one. I’ve been lucky enough to have owned that watch for the thick end of 2 years (prior to moving on). It’s absolutely terrific and is a one for one copy - but it is extremely clinical in its execution.
If I was in the market for an E/W again (or any speedmaster for that matter), I’d 100% go vintage and have a smile on my face at the old warhorse who keeps going (FWIW I reckon if you polled most omega forum members, most would prefer the vintage all things being equal).
having said that, I’m currently in a full blown love affair with a reedition of a Heuer Carrera.
these things don’t need to make sense. No right or wrong answers - only personal preference really.
That’s an interesting view on vintage as I don’t see patina and wear as being a requirement that needs satisfying to be classed as vintage. I just see it as coming from a certain era, that’s about it.
The Ed White is an interesting piece for sure. It’s not something I would buy, although the Moonshine Gold with Gold Dial did draw my eye when I saw someone wearing it. Proper attention grabber, which would put me off though, whereas the Ed White would blend better.
You're definitely right though, there’s no right or wrong overall, just right or wrong for ourselves if we were to follow someone else’s taste and not trust our own.