New Monaco for Monaco Grand Prix?

YG_Rulz
Posts
1,119
Likes
1,925
It comes back to whether we consider a Monaco a luxury piece worthy of the now asking £7k and £10k. No doubt the 2025 models will be more expensive, owing to some story the marketing team would make up pointing towards the watch's legacy, Gulf, Le Mans and SMcQ.

One would hope that TAG has learnt from their previous pricing strategy where they couldn't move the previous LEs (remember the seafarers), but I doubt that the depreciation of their watches and tye impression it leaves on the market is considered by TAG's marketing team.
 
Aquagraph
Posts
22,694
Likes
32,364
Mspeedster Mspeedster
Strange. The ones I saw were not numbered. It had “One of 970” for the 1970 Stopwatch and “One of 971” for the Gulf, eluding to the movie’s release year of 1971.

Oh... they're going with the silly numbering again. ::rimshot::
 
Gene242
Posts
112
Likes
119
Watchmen_DR Watchmen_DR
They’re gonna be numbered each of them so I’m guessing that helped factor the price point too 😭
From what i saw, they are doing the
one of xxx ... The only drawback
It makes me regret not getting the night driver even more:
Garde 5 titanium, fully lume dial and properly numbered
 
Jim Dollares
Posts
10,387
Likes
13,728
Aquagraph Aquagraph
Oh... they're going with the silly numbering again. ::rimshot::
At this price point you can't really ask for luxury like individual numbering 👍🏻
 
Watchmen_DR
Posts
64
Likes
46
Mspeedster Mspeedster
Strange. The ones I saw were not numbered. It had “One of 970” for the 1970 Stopwatch and “One of 971” for the Gulf, eluding to the movie’s release year of 1971.
That IS going to be the numbering. Only making that many of them for each, just skipping the individual specific numbers
 
Aquagraph
Posts
22,694
Likes
32,364
Jim Dollares Jim Dollares
At this price point you can't really ask for luxury like individual numbering 👍🏻
That's not what I meant, I meant the dumbass 971 for 1971 and 970 for 1970. It's silly.
 
Jemagloh
Posts
2,067
Likes
8,100
Watchmen_DR Watchmen_DR
That IS going to be the numbering. Only making that many of them for each, just skipping the individual specific numbers
The “ONE of X” continues to be an extremely lazy way of doing LEs.
 
Watchmen_DR
Posts
64
Likes
46
Jemagloh Jemagloh
The “ONE of X” continues to be an extremely lazy way of doing LEs.
Yes I agree. I would prefer either do it the traditional way or not at all.
 
Jim Dollares
Posts
10,387
Likes
13,728
Aquagraph Aquagraph
That's not what I meant, I meant the dumbass 971 for 1971 and 970 for 1970. It's silly.
Oooh yes I agree but we all know it would take probably five years for TAG to move 1971 pieces of these. Or are you saying that numbers can be made up without having proper significance in history? 😝

#swissmarketingisajoke
 
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

YG_Rulz

[SOLD]: Monaco Grand Prix de Historique CBL2114

YG_Rulz Marketplace
imagwai
imagwai
Posts
1
Views
625
G

Help finding parts for Monaco CW2113

Gio Salvador TAG Heuer Discussion
G
Gio Salvador
Posts
0
Views
354
KojakWeb

The Tron/FU Monaco - A break with tradition (again?)

KojakWeb TAG Heuer Discussion
KojakWeb
KojakWeb
Posts
18
Views
2K
Pitfitter446

New Monaco Gulf.

Pitfitter446 TAG Heuer Discussion
Aquagraph
Aquagraph
Posts
10
Views
695
Monaco_Lover

My Monaco Journey and Modest Collection

Monaco_Lover TAG Heuer Discussion
kappa_md
kappa_md
Posts
37
Views
3K
Calibre11

New Post- Monaco Grand Prix de Monaco Historique- In Depth Review

Calibre11 TAG Heuer Discussion
Jemagloh
Jemagloh
Posts
62
Views
5K