Guys. Guys....
What the hell am I even looking at here? The bezel looks perfect. I almost want to believe it is a real bezel, for some weird reason.
The back case looks good, except it has the wrong model number... And I think it's a bubble back, such as for an automatic?
https://www.rubylane.com/item/802481-13689/Tag-Heuer-WK1211-Professional-200m-Stainless
G GjohnausThanks, definitely thought so, just being curious though: which elements show that the watch is a "bad" fake?
Hadn't paid much attention to this thread in the past but I'm reading it backwards and I now see I have bought about the most counterfeited TH there is.
Opened it up, here's pictures of the caseback and movement. As expected it looks like the designated movement.
That is weird. I did not know they were still putting those movements in by that time. Tho it should say tag heuer on it. But who knows what the watch maker did with it. Keep in mind, that movements don't matter anymore, as the fakes DO have the designated movements now. Tho I've never seen this movement used in the fakes. Always the newer stamped barely repairable movements. First the silver Swiss parts one. and now they are using the gold swiss made ones. One thing they still don't do, is use movement holder screws on the quartz. I don't recall the last time I've actually see the WBD1110 in a fake version. Got more pictures?
That is weird. I did not know they were still putting those movements in by that time. Tho it should say tag heuer on it. But who knows what the watch maker did with it. Keep in mind, that movements don't matter anymore, as the fakes DO have the designated movements now. Tho I've never seen this movement used in the fakes. Always the newer stamped barely repairable movements. First the silver Swiss parts one. and now they are using the gold swiss made ones. One thing they still don't do, is use movement holder screws on the quartz. I don't recall the last time I've actually see the WBD1110 in a fake version. Got more pictures?