200m isn’t a joke?
No the smaller size will be 200m
Squale can sell you an original, proper Swiss made automatic with ETA movement resistant to 5atm (500m) for under $1k. But I guess they don't have the allure of the TAG brand name.
I feel bad now - sorry guys, my comments were purely April Fool themed.
Lets not compare specs and value for money, there is always something with better specifications for less money 😀 I guess market research tells them 200m is plenty enough for the average customer. I mean, other brands sell divers with 100m water resistance and seem to do fine, isnt for example the Oris diver 65 specified to 100m. I think Aquaracer is not a watch you buy when you want "the best", its something you buy cause it looks insanely good, is well built and has the TAG name.
I think the point I was kind of trying to make, or one of them, was that the people who will mainly buy the Aquaracer are really after the brand name rather than the specs. Not that anybody really uses either of these watches for diving these days anyway.
200m is not enough for a dive watch or watersport watch. Ok for the pool or snorkling but not for anything deeper than that. I wouldn't take it jetskiing.
I’m pretty happy with my 300M and 500M ARs. Though I never used them underwater 😜 I wonder why they need to go 200M 😕
because 200m is kinda a bullshit number lol. It doesn't really mean as much as people think it means. As yago mentioned, you really shouldn't be taking them anywhere but a pool. Would you trust a 30m water resistant watch, for diving? After all, most people don't go anywhere near 30m. Hell, how about 10m? That's still deeper than the casual diver or snorkeler, but 10m would be low on even a $10 watch. The numbers are just meaningless really. Even the most basic watch has numbers that are deeper than most anyone will go, yet we've all seen how quickly those watches go bad from just hand washing.
I do agree, I don’t take the numbers literally. And also probably more than 90+% of Aquaracers sold aren’t use either for diving or any watersports. It’s just a great day-to-day no-nonsense reliable watch. The point I’m trying to make is about perception & marketing. We will here again legion of trolls bashing TAG Heuer etc etc. “200M dive watch” knowing TAG Heuer made 500M and 300M ARs. is it about cost cutting? Is it aboit quality control? Either way to me it’s just all about credible marketing and I hope TAG Heuer has a good answer to that.