Yago
·It’s very cool!
No one on the forum has one??
@ecgo does. See pages 6, 7 & 8 for his pics.
My question is why hasn't @Aquagraph pulled the trigger? 😗
Good question..... I dunno, I haven't seen one and I'm not 100% sure about that weird finish on the titanium - I feel like I might love it or I might not. Now I've bought the WAZ101A so...
Although with this one I think the price might be justified.
You certainly pay for the name, for both TAG Heuer and Bamford but that's the case for all established brands. I don't think the price is the issue, they just made too many. They'll be around for a while and plenty of discounted pre-owned options floating. Might pick one up at some point but would need to try first. Those 43mm scare me 😉
For me, as long as they're using the Sellita I can't see myself spending more than 2k for one.
Most microbrands using the SW200 come in between 400 and 1000 US, and some of the nicer small brands (Yema and the like) come in below 1500. Even titanium watches are maybe 2k, and the more expensive ones are very nicely finished just like the TAG. So with the Calibre 5 watches, it's pretty clear you're paying more for the name than anything else :/
Even all the counterfeit watches are using the SW200.... And those things cost $100-200
You certainly pay for the name, for both TAG Heuer and Bamford but that's the case for all established brands.
Yeah, I should have clarified - it's not the SW200 that's the issue so much as the fact that TAG doesn't do much to refine or finish it. I've got a Breitling Superocean and an IWC Mark XVIII that both use an SW200 base, and they both went for $4000 or so new - but you can tell there's been a lot of work put into that movement to refine it when you wind it or go to set the time. The TAGs have the same cheap feeling as the micros - or the fakes.
Lets called it the way TH called it which is Calibre 5.
I found one of these at 5th Ave last week too. Such a cool watch but man that cyclops is just 🤮
No date and I very well might have walked out with it!