2017 TAG Heuer Autavia Heuer-02 (Ref. CBE2110) Update

Posts
7,123
Likes
15,096
Given that it's going to take me longer than I thought to put up the interview with JC Biver, I thought that I'd give a quick answer to the questions on the Autavia.

As the title of the thread says, the new Autavia will be powered by the Calibre CH80, which as we guessed a few months back, will be renamed the Calibre Heuer-03. While the initial run will be small, the Heuer-03 will then be offered in the standard TAG Heuer range from 2018/ 2019. There are no major changes between the CH80 and Heuer-03.

For 2017 there will be just one model offered- the Black dial with the white sub-dials. Expect a case size of 41mm, and while I didn't specifically ask the question, I'd certainly expect a date function too. Could there be other colour dials? Yes, but after a year or so. Not initially.

So, why will TAG Heuer make a larger case size and add a date when the original was 39mm and had no date? Biver was very strong on this- had no interest in making an exact copy. The original stays the original, and the vintage collectors can stick with that knowing there is no modern copy. The new watch is made for 2017, and while it takes its style from the past, they do not want to repeat what happened with the Silverstone- i.e. vintage collectors argue the case for an exact re-edition and then don't buy it when it comes out because it, because they're only into vintage! Can't win.

More soon, but wanted to share the Autavia news!
 
Posts
3,254
Likes
2,314
That's fantastic news about the movement. Very happy to hear that the CH80 will live on and be used throughout the range.
 
Posts
6,023
Likes
7,258
Many thanks for the update David, and for posing our questions. To be clear - I don't want smaller sizes because I want a vintage copy. It's simply because I have a small wrist and Tag Heuer offers hardly anything in a size that works for me these days. The 41mm Carrera (JH80th) just about works, but I sold mine because I thought it was too thick.

However...with the Autavia case style, 41mm *may* just work OK for me - will have to try it. 39mm would be better, mind!
 
Posts
7,123
Likes
15,096
Many thanks for the update David, and for posing our questions. To be clear - I don't want smaller sizes because I want a vintage copy. It's simply because I have a small wrist and Tag Heuer offers hardly anything in a size that works for me these days. The 41mm Carrera (JH80th) just about works, but I sold mine because I thought it was too thick.

However...with the Autavia case style, 41mm *may* just work OK for me - will have to try it. 39mm would be better, mind!

Yes, understand your view- I'd also prefer 39mm and like you, not because I want a copy.
 
Posts
11,623
Likes
37,342
41mm is good news - with a proper design, it shouldn't appear too large on the wrist. However, thickness is the main concern, with modern TAGs sitting on top of your wrist like miniature skyscrapers. Any details on this?
 
Posts
10,120
Likes
11,179
Thanks for the update! Was there confirmation on using the Heuer logo and a rotating bezel? Will this be limited / numbered?
 
Posts
7,123
Likes
15,096
Thanks for the update! Was there confirmation on using the Heuer logo and a rotating bezel? Will this be limited / numbered?

I didn't cover those off, but you can safely bet on the Heuer logo.
 
Posts
10,120
Likes
11,179
I for one, am excited about this direction. I want a reenvisioning of classic models, but with calculated design improvements. Not everything was perfect from origin. In its core, I want a reliable automatic chronograph movement that can handle shock/vibration, pressured water resistance, and be immune to magnetic interference. The case, strap and bracelet should be constructed of fine sophisticated alloys that are scratch resistant, light weight, comfortable, and most importantly attractive. Add a convex (non-glassbox / non-domed) sapphire crystal, all packaged in a larger size (41mm or above is my preference) and you have what should be the direct lineage of the classics.
 
Posts
7,123
Likes
15,096
Forgot to add- JC Biver also flagged the intention to develop other variants of the CH80/ Calibre Heuer-03. We've already had the Heuer-02T.

He specifically mentioned the possibility of a 3-hand watch movement
 
Posts
10,120
Likes
11,179
Forgot to add- JC Biver also flagged the intention to develop other variants of the CH80/ Calibre Heuer-03. We've already had the Heuer-02T.

He specifically mentioned the possibility of a 3-hand watch movement
Do you think possibly a GMT variant? Or just a traditional 3-hand?
 
Posts
7,123
Likes
15,096
Do you think possibly a GMT variant? Or just a traditional 3-hand?
I think all options are possible 😉
 
Posts
3,254
Likes
2,314
Forgot to add- JC Biver also flagged the intention to develop other variants of the CH80/ Calibre Heuer-03. We've already had the Heuer-02T.

He specifically mentioned the possibility of a 3-hand watch movement

It would be good to see a bi-compax chrono variant too as an in-house replacement for the Calibre 17.
 
Posts
10,120
Likes
11,179
So here's a picture of what appears to be an old one to compare:
 
Posts
11,623
Likes
37,342
Looks super thick 🙁

Otherwise - noting that this is a prototype - it looks bang on
 
Posts
6,023
Likes
7,258
Overall impression is quite good, but it looks big. Hope it's not too big. The bezel looks quite wide also. Sorry to bang on about the same thing, but shave 3mm off the case size (to 39mm) by making the bezel narrower and you have a perfect watch. Date window and the "Heuer 02/03" text isn't a deal-breaker for a modern reincarnation.

I will need to try it on. Then the decision will be whether to trade in my FOIS. The smaller diameter of the FOIS may work in its favour. Also, Omega didn't seem to have a problem finding buyers for a manual wind with no date window!! What would you do I wonder?