Hi all, I purchased a CAW211R over the holiday and had a chance to get some macro shots of it.
I got the microscope out to look at the oil reservoir on a vintage Rolex Lady Datejust 26 I just bought my wife; the watch was made in 1988 and I have no idea of it's service history so I wanted to get a look before I decided what attention it needed.
The setup is a Nikon SM-1 stereo microscope with huge 23mm 10x oculars and a 0.8 to 4x base for a maximum magnification of 40x. Illumination is a 40-LED ring light with brightness control (essential). I had been using a handheld iPhone placed over one ocular to take macros but someone on WUS suggested a cheap frame for the purpose. I discovered it works best through the magnification lens on the iPhone 13 Pro (use 3x setting) and placed as far away from the ocular as the frame allows.
So here's the watch:
First the movement. It has a display caseback so no warranties were harmed in the making of these photos. The rotor bearing (and the base-movement center seconds hand upper bushing):
At close zoom, I could see the seconds hand pinion turning; note that this gear always turns and it's the one that drives ALL movement in the chrono module (well, except the date ring).
The rotor logo:
What I was really interest in:
I'm looking for the outline of the oil reservoir as I mentioned above. While it's easier to see with stereo, inside the boundary appears wet and outside appears dry. It's actually the meniscus between the bushing that's domed on the upper side and the flat-bottomed cap stone. The space widens as it moves away from center, and a proper amount of oil will fill it to about 2/3 the diameter of the jewel. If you follow it around, it's the only line that's not exactly round. So things look good on this bushing.
Wifey Watchdog's Datejust was about half the total diameter, indicting a service within the last few years (or perhaps a light touch when serviced) so no problem wearing it (but I did just purchase an authentic mainspring for the eventual service on my part).
On to more movement macros, here's the balance wheel (not hacked tho):
... a bit overexposed.
The view did reveal a little issue:
There's a nasty burr where the regulator cut into the brass boss on the cock surrounding the shock protector. It's right in the center of the pic and really obvious in stereo. There's also a bit of contamination at this level. In the shot I annotated, there's a couple nougies on the cap jewel. Nothing you can see with the naked eye but at 40x, pretty obvious.
On to the dial:
The "Gulf" logo. The dial to the left of the light blue band has a sunburst finish, made by abrading the base material in a pattern that starts at the center and goes outward. The dark blue finish (the color of raw crude, I'm told by the promo insert) is thin enough to see the sunburst through, likely lacquer with a tint. The light blue is pad printed and it looks as though a pattern is pad printed either underneath it or on top in the same paint.
A closer shot of the logo:
Wow. What is that stuff? I doubt it's contamination under the paint as the blue stripe doesn't have it and I don't see anything on the dark blue. I suspect it's pad printed or in the base white that was the first color to be printed, perhaps to give it a semi-flat look. Again, the dial looks great to the naked eye, so I doubt TAG wanted or expected anyone to take these shots.
Finally, the running-seconds register. BTW, the movement is called Cal 11 but it's hardly anything like the true Heuer model, being a Sellita Top Grade SW300-1 turned upside down on a bespoke DD chrono module. The original Cal 11 didn't have running seconds and that would have been a deal-breaker for me personally:
Again we see the printed pattern on the light blue band but not on the orange. And the sunburst dial peeks out from beneath the bands. I think the register is nicely executed and the artifact on the hand is the ring-light on the microscope.
Just to sooth your eyes after all this:
Edit: I expect the mods to file this post at the end of some infinitely long thread that already exists and I'm fine with that, but I though you should see it up front and get a look before they do.