Brown rubber straps, maybe... 😗
Heuer was the reference when it came to motorsport, tasteful vintage racing and what have you.
And TH can't even honor probably the greatest driver of mankind.
It's not going to be everyone's favourebut I see potential in the new integrated bracelet Link model.
Imagine it had a more sharp, flush fitting links like the 3rd gen and the watch as a whole leaning more towards a Genta integrated style.
Yes, I'm trying not to say Royal Oak.
Rubber straps all tend to resemble a certain brown substance
😁 😁 😁
I kid. I suppose Alec Monopoly and Cara Delevignge (sp?) watches have their fans, but for me I wish TAG would introduce a few more vintage style pieces to go alongside their.... contemporary.... lines.
Heuer has made a large shift from positioning themselves as the go-to watch for people who do cool things, to TAG now who position themselves as the watch for people who look cool on Instagram. Fine if you're a fan of teenage models, really, but disappointing if you became a fan of Heuer because of their associations with the golden age of automobile racing.
It's not going to be everyone's favourebut I see potential in the new integrated bracelet Link model.
Imagine it had a more sharp, flush fitting links like the 3rd gen and the watch as a whole leaning more towards a Genta integrated style.
Yes, I'm trying not to say Royal Oak.
Fair enough, but please do not for one moment that I like diamond encrusted bezels, quilted straps or Alec Monopoly.
TAG can never live up to your memories, it's like me hoping a new Iron Maiden album will be any good. It won't, even if some people say it is, they're lying. So I moved on. I still listen to Number of the Beast, and you can still wear your old Heuers.
Watching that interview with JCB the other day, he said 'calling the brand TAG Heuer was stupid but it's too late to change it now'. I wish they hadn't changed it and then the TAG haters would be forced to acknowledge that this is Heuer now. TAG weren't the only company to change hands throughout their history, but they were the only one dumb enough to change their name
I never said you did, nor did I think so. But TAG does produce these watches, and feature them in their advertising
Yes but why must TAG Heuer be the brand it insists upon being, with only a perfunctory nod towards their past? Again - and I apologize for belaboring this particular example, but bear with me - at the Omega booth at Basel this morning, we have both faithful vintage reproductions for those who have loved Omega through the years for its heritage, as well as a blue ceramic 43mm diver with orange accents (that they'll even supply an orange rubber strap for)... this, in addition to the colorful, existing Planet Ocean Deep Black range.
At TAG Heuer we have what feels like 100 different variations of the Heuer-01, all contemporarily styled, and then an Autavia reissue that they called a nod to their heritage but that they insisted upon "improving" for the Monopoly crowd, with a 42mm case diameter and date function.
How come Omega can be the Omega we've always loved but also the Omega that new fans can enjoy, while TAG Heuer cannot? Why must I move on from TAG Heuer and stick to old Heuers when Omega says "Yes, we know why you love us, and we intend to keep it that way!"
Agree that the TAG rebranding in the '80s was stupid, but disagree that that is the underlying problem here. Watch the episode of Hodinkee's Talking Watches with Biver and you'll see he does indeed understand vintage enthusiasts. Why does he make only the slightest gesture towards them by resurrecting names and styling cues, but only offering modern contemporary watches to them?
I never said you did, nor did I think so. But TAG does produce these watches, and feature them in their advertising
Yes but why must TAG Heuer be the brand it insists upon being, with only a perfunctory nod towards their past? Again - and I apologize for belaboring this particular example, but bear with me - at the Omega booth at Basel this morning, we have both faithful vintage reproductions for those who have loved Omega through the years for its heritage, as well as a blue ceramic 43mm diver with orange accents (that they'll even supply an orange rubber strap for)... this, in addition to the colorful, existing Planet Ocean Deep Black range.
At TAG Heuer we have what feels like 100 different variations of the Heuer-01, all contemporarily styled, and then an Autavia reissue that they called a nod to their heritage but that they insisted upon "improving" for the Monopoly crowd, with a 42mm case diameter and date function.
How come Omega can be the Omega we've always loved but also the Omega that new fans can enjoy, while TAG Heuer cannot? Why must I move on from TAG Heuer and stick to old Heuers when Omega says "Yes, we know why you love us, and we intend to keep it that way!"
Agree that the TAG rebranding in the '80s was stupid, but disagree that that is the underlying problem here. Watch the episode of Hodinkee's Talking Watches with Biver and you'll see he does indeed understand vintage enthusiasts. Why does he make only the slightest gesture towards them by resurrecting names and styling cues, but only offering modern contemporary watches to them?
When Justin Biver took over TAG, the company was a mess yes but was also trying to innovate with exciting new movements. I truly believe that if Biver took this seriously, TAG would be seen as a watch brand to be reckoned with again. Unfortunately, Justin did not see this and I wish I had this video clip but in it, he said 'it's not a Piaget, Blancpain etc. It's A TAG!' And from that interview, we now have 10 year old djs, a masked dude with spray cans, a tattooed Latin dude, an always half naked model etc representing a more than 150 year old brand that was at one time well respected.
I may of called Rolex & Omega owners douchebags but I must admit, they do still have respect for the Heuer brand, just not TAG.