Eh, there are lots of reasons for that, many of which are complicated. For example, the US has worse maternal/fetal/infant issues than similarly wealthy countries in Europe, because US mothers choose to give birth to babies that in Europe would be aborted. E.g., the incidence of Down Syndrome in live births in Europe is practically 0. If Down Syndrome is detected in the womb, the fetus is aborted. In the US, a large percentage of mothers with Down Syndrome fetuses choose to proceed with their pregnancies. The same is true for all kinds of fetal abnormalities. Needless to say, the higher rate of live births of babies with sometimes significant abnormalities, produces problems for mother, baby-in-womb, and baby-after-birth. This lowers our rates for maternal health, fetal health, infant health, etc.
Now, there are certainly valid ethical debates that can be had on such things. I'm not trying to say that Europeans are heartless baby-killers. I'm not sure where my own sentiments lie in this matter, to be honest. I can see both sides, and I can certainly understand the argument that aborting a fetus with significant abnormalities is more humane than to let it be born. But in any case, the point is that some of the numbers that come out making the US look bad (like higher maternal and fetal death rates) are not due to quality of health care per se, but to other societal factors.
Back to the topic, I am sad to see JCB stepping down, even though I thought that some of the stuff he introduced was ugly. He was trying to push for new things, and a lot of the times, new stuff comes out ugly. I appreciate the efforts to push watch design forward.