Mr_Orange
·That's right. Buy the original, stop buying the re-editions and complaining about them.
Edited:
It’s all about Evolution & Revolution (in some cases) 😉
If you’re looking for features of the original, then just get the original 👍
Hard to compare with the likes of the Submariner, Daytona or Speedmaster which almost stayed the same throughout the years. 🙄
The lugs appear "shorter", even though the case grew. The lugs' angles are "softer", more rounded, less aggressive,
It’s all about Evolution & Revolution (in some cases) 😉
If you’re looking for features of the original, then just get the original 👍
Hard to compare with the likes of the Submariner, Daytona or Speedmaster which almost stayed the same throughout the years. 🙄
Because to TAG, anything is a Carrera as long as the lugs vaguely resemble the original's.
Okay, so the 510.511 I posted at the start of this article isn't exactly dressy is it? I feel like the more I look into things the more I find that it was Heuer that were breaking the 'rules' before TAG even got involved.
With the more relaxed, casual style trend shift by the end of the '60s, and especially with the advent of quartz / digital technology (and thus the commodification of the wristwatch), the Carrera evolved to be more design-forward along with most other sporty watch lines.
You can’t have a 39mm case AND the same lugs as the original. They would stretch too far out, poke your eye out. I have no issues with the lugs, it’s the case thickness and glassbox that bother me.
Bolded
Cool, so we can all agree that it was actually Heuer and we can stop all this 'TAG' ruined the Carrera nonsense.