Mspeedster
·First video I've seen of the new Aquaracer GMT, looks a lot better than the renders. What do you guys think?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/ChFDnj-lGZK/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Do most TAG buyers even know what Tudor is?
First video I've seen of the new Aquaracer GMT, looks a lot better than the renders. What do you guys think?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/ChFDnj-lGZK/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Do most TAG buyers even know what Tudor is?
Definitely not modern, it has fauxtina! This is the thing, TAG has very little direct competition when it comes to looks. Which is probably why they can get away with charging more. The other brands are competing more because they are operating in a similar aesthetic.
Judging by this forum, I'd say yes.
Do you really think this forum represents "most TAG buyers"? I think we are a rare bunch of mega nerds here
Do you really think this forum represents "most TAG buyers"? I think we are a rare bunch of mega nerds here
Controversial opinion... the Aquaracer looks like a poor man's cross between a Rolex Sub and an Omega Seamaster.
Do you really think this forum represents "most TAG buyers"? I think we are a rare bunch of mega nerds here
I get way more Seamaster vibes from the Aquaracer, not as much Submariner. OTOH, the 1000 was totally a poor man's sub, but I love them. So is the Black Bay, but I love them too.
I think in our romanticism of the brand, we are forgetting that TAG is a gateway Swiss watch, the first 'nice' watch you buy when you want to show you've made it, but aren't grown up enough to buy a rolex.
Stop someone in the street and ask them to name Swiss watch brands, Id bet the vast majority of average people would only be able to name TAG and Rolex.
Given Tudor are in most AD’s that stock TAG watches these days, I’d say they probably do know Tudor in some shape or form. If not from that, then from the regular page size adverts in national newspapers that keep popping up every week will put that name in many heads.
For sure most TAG buyers would be aware of Tudor, but considering TAG is 'supposedly' aimed at younger buyers, does the Tudor aesthetic appeal to a lot of them? I could totally understand where a 25 year old guy would think a TAG looked cool, but a Tudor looked old fashioned and possibly a bit boring. I'm not baiting you guys, but you surely see that not many young people who have grown up with technology all around them are that interested in watches that look like their Dad would wear. And I'm sure many of TAGs customers are not really all that interested in watches full stop, they are probably expensive fashion statements and they would probably buy them even if they were quartz. Same could be said for Hublot to be honest, just for richer kids. To be honest my primary interest in watches is aesthetic, I couldn't care less about in house movements and true GMTs, which is probably why I only own TAGs because there isn't really an obvious competitor in the same price bracket offering contempary styling. You can tell me Longines, but all I see there is slightly less obvious vintageness, and some modern designs that I don't actually like. Even Tudor has some modern designs (Dark Rider or whatever it's called) but no one talks about them cos no one likes them.
Isn't it just great that all of our TAG Heuer threads in the THF turn into a discussion about Tudor...
For once via thread or photo, I didn’t start it!
I’d just like that on record your honour 😁
I’d actually say that’s the opposite right now.