For sure most TAG buyers would be aware of Tudor, but considering TAG is 'supposedly' aimed at younger buyers, does the Tudor aesthetic appeal to a lot of them? I could totally understand where a 25 year old guy would think a TAG looked cool, but a Tudor looked old fashioned and possibly a bit boring. I'm not baiting you guys, but you surely see that not many young people who have grown up with technology all around them are that interested in watches that look like their Dad would wear. And I'm sure many of TAGs customers are not really all that interested in watches full stop, they are probably expensive fashion statements and they would probably buy them even if they were quartz. Same could be said for Hublot to be honest, just for richer kids. To be honest my primary interest in watches is aesthetic, I couldn't care less about in house movements and true GMTs, which is probably why I only own TAGs because there isn't really an obvious competitor in the same price bracket offering contempary styling. You can tell me Longines, but all I see there is slightly less obvious vintageness, and some modern designs that I don't actually like. Even Tudor has some modern designs (Dark Rider or whatever it's called) but no one talks about them cos no one likes them.
Click to expand...