Seems very strange to me. A "vintage" design that's not an actual old Heuer design. And an "Autavia" that looks nothing like previous Autavias, not even the case? Why even call it an Autavia then? Ok, sure Autavia was originally meant to incorporate aviation, but it never really took off in that direction, and everybody now knows the Autavia as an auto racing chronograph. And a pilot's watch with a 60-minute bezel, rather than a 12 hour or (better yet) a 24-hour GMT bezel with a GMT hand. Again, I just don't get it.... if Breitling introduced this watch, or just about any other brand really, I'd get it, but TAG Heuer releasing this as an Autavia? It's a head-scratcher.
As for the watch itself, it's beautiful, and I like the incorporation of the new carbon spring into an off-the-shelf calibre. I really just don't get why it's called an Autavia. Or why they're going faux "vintage" for a non-heritage design. TAG to me is forward-looking, modern, not putting out some kind of WWII pilot's watch copy. Great design, terrible branding. Put it somewhere else within LVMH, or if it must be a TAG, at least don't call it an Autavia.
Also seems weird to me that the first use of the new mainspring outside of the Nanograph is a completely new model. Why not put it into the Aquaracer or Carrera or Monaco before coming out with completely new models?