THJunkie
·Does anyone else think that the 2 year cover that Tag provide is now looking a bit meek compared to the competition? Especially for the more expensive end of their range with ‘in house’ movement.
With most of their competitors offering 3 to 5 years (Even Longines which is much cheaper!). Are Tag basically admitting that their quality is not that good and purely marketing/cosmetic by not standing firmer behind the longevity of their product?
With most of their competitors offering 3 to 5 years (Even Longines which is much cheaper!). Are Tag basically admitting that their quality is not that good and purely marketing/cosmetic by not standing firmer behind the longevity of their product?